What is rational-legal authority quizlet?

What is rational-legal authority quizlet?

Rational Legal Authority. -Based on written rules- a type of power that “reasonable” people agree to and write into law. -Authority comes from the position that someone holds, not the person who holds that position. -Everyone is subject to organizations written rules.

What is the meaning of rational-legal authority?

Legal-rational authority indicates that authority is invested in a set of rules and rule-bound institutions and that the creating and changing the rules are outside of the control of those who administer them; it does not mean, however, that the authority is democratic.

What are the three types of authority identified by Max Weber quizlet?

Weber’s three types of authority are traditional, charismatic, and legal-rational authority.

What are the differences between traditional charismatic and rational-legal authority?

Charismatic authority: Power legitimized by extraordinary personal abilities that inspire devotion and obedience. Rational-legal authority: Also known as bureaucratic authority, is when power is legitimized by legally enacted rules and regulations such as Weber.

Why do rational-legal and traditional authorities take careful precautions?

Why do rational-legal and traditional authorities take careful precautions in opposing charismatic leaders? Charismatic leaders direct followers according to personal preference. Why did Joan of Arc, Adolph Hitler, and Jesus Christ all have in common? They were all charismatic leaders.

What is the difference between traditional authority and rational-legal authority?

Whereas traditional authority resides in an individual because of inheritance or divine designation, rational-legal authority resides in the office that an individual fills, not in the individual per se.

What is legal-rational authority PDF?

Rational legal authority is a concept developed by Max Weber (1864–1920) to explain the stability of domination in modern times, especially in bureaucracies and democracies.

Which is an example of leaders in rational-legal authority quizlet?

Modern constitutional democracies are an example of rational-legal authority. Charismatic authority is based on an individual’s outstanding traits, which attract followers. The leadership of Joan of Arc would represent an example of charismatic authority.

What is the characteristic of rational-legal authority?

Rational-legal authority is legitimate because laws, rules, norms, and procedures are respected and obeyed because they are laws, rules, norms, and procedures. Rational-legal authority is reifying and rarely challenged. People obey rational-legal authority because of law, instead of belief (charisma) or tradition.

Is rational-legal authority more stable than charismatic authority?

Weber emphasized that charismatic authority in its pure form (i.e., when authority resides in someone solely because of the person’s charisma and not because the person also has traditional or rational-legal authority) is less stable than traditional authority or rational-legal authority.

What did Max Weber predict?

Weber’s studies of bureaucracy also led him to his accurate prediction that socialism in Russia would, due to abolishing the free market and its mechanisms, lead to over-bureaucratization (evident, for example, in the shortage economy) rather than to the “withering away of the state” (as Karl Marx had predicted would …

What are the characteristics of legal-rational authority?

What is the major source of power in legal-rational authority?

According to Weber, power made legitimate by laws, written rules, and regulations is termed rational-legal authority. In this type of authority, power is vested in a particular rationale, system, or ideology and not necessarily in the person who implements the specifics of that doctrine.

What belief forms the foundation of rational-legal authority?

If traditional authority derives from custom and tradition, rational-legal authority derives from law and is based on a belief in the legitimacy of a society’s laws and rules and in the right of leaders to act under these rules to make decisions and set policy.

Why are traditional and rational-legal authorities careful to oppose charismatic leaders?

Why do rational-legal and traditional authorities take careful precautions in opposing charismatic leaders? Charismatic leaders direct followers according to personal preference. Why did Joan of Arc, Adolph Hitler, and Jesus Christ all have in common?

What are the different types of authority?

These are the key types of authority and authority examples in modern society.

• Founder authority. Founder authority is usually held by the founding member of a group or organization.
• Ownership authority.
• Punitive authority.
• Relational authority.
• Reward authority.
• Results authority.
• Expert authority.
• Reverent authority.

What is the difference between rational legal and rational authority?

-This is based on written rules -“Rational” means reasonable and “legal” means law, so rational-legal refers to matters that been agreed to by reasonable people and is written into law -This is also known as “bureaucratic authority” the authority lies in the position not the person, everyone is subject to written rules

What does rational-legal mean?

-“Rational” means reasonable and “legal” means law, so rational-legal refers to matters that been agreed to by reasonable people and is written into law -This is also known as “bureaucratic authority” the authority lies in the position not the person, everyone is subject to written rules

What is the difference between charismatic and rational-legal authority?

-In rational-legal authority the person who is next inline is not given, but the process remains intact. -In Charismatic authority there are no rules for succession, this makes this type of authority the least stable the routinization of charisma