What did the Anti-Federalists argue in favor of?

What did the Anti-Federalists argue in favor of?

The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power. They favored small localized governments with limited national authority as was exercised under the Articles of Confederation.

What did the Anti-Federalists argue against?

Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.

Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the American Constitution quizlet?

The anti-federalists opposed the Constitution because they feared an overly-strong national government. Their strongest point was that a large government was too far from the people and that special interests and factions would take over.

What states supported Anti-Federalists?

The Anti-Federalists were strong in the key states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. In North Carolina and Rhode Island they prevented ratification of the Constitution until after the new government had been established. Stilling their opposition in order to support the first administration of U.S. Pres.

What did the Anti-Federalists want quizlet?

Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution created a central government that was too strong and that would abuse power. The United States needs a strong, central government. The Constitution would lead to a loss of state and local control.

What did the Anti-Federalists support quizlet?

Anti-Federalists believed a Bill of Rights had to be added to the Constitution in order to protect personal freedom. Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution created a central government that was too strong and that would abuse power.

Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the American Constitution?

People opposed to the ratification of the Constitution were called the Anti-Federalists. They were concerned that the Constitution gave too much power to the national government at the expense of the state governments.