Table of Contents
What did Muller v. Oregon decide?
Muller v. Oregon, one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era, upheld an Oregon law limiting the workday for female wage earners to ten hours. The case established a precedent in 1908 to expand the reach of state activity into the realm of protective labor legislation.
What did Muller v. Oregon do?
Muller v. Oregon (1908) is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a state could limit the amount of hours a woman could work while not also limiting the hours of men.
Why did Muller believe the Oregon law was unconstitutional?
Muller believed the Oregon law was unconstitutional because it violated his freedom of contract under the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause under the rule of Lochner and was not a valid health regulation.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Muller v. Oregon quizlet?
Terms in this set (4) A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women. The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health.
Why is Muller v. Oregon 1908 considered a landmark case quizlet?
Muller v. Oregon (1908) and Brown v. Board of Education (1954) are considered landmark cases in the history of forensic psychology because they: signified the use of social science research in court rulings.
Who was president during Muller v. Oregon?
President Benjamin Harrison
(1837-1910): Brewer, an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1889-1910), was appointed to the High Court bench by President Benjamin Harrison. He delivered the unanimous opinion in the Muller v. State of Oregon case.
What major political reforms did progressives hope to achieve?
Progressives were interested in establishing a more transparent and accountable government which would work to improve U.S. society. These reformers favored such policies as civil service reform, food safety laws, and increased political rights for women and U.S. workers.
What is the significance of Muller v Oregon quizlet?
Oregon enacted a law that limited women to ten hours of work in factories and laundries. Muller challenges it after he orders a female employee to work longer hours.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Muller v Oregon quizlet?
What was Muller v. Oregon quizlet?
Who was responsible for Muller v. Oregon?
Curt Muller
Curt Muller, the owner of a laundry business, was convicted of violating Oregon labor laws by making a female employee work more than ten hours in a single day. Muller was fined $10.
Who was the defendant in Muller v. Oregon?
Oregon’s Supreme Court The case was filed in the circuit court of the State for Multnomah County charging the defendant, Curt Muller, for allowing overseer, Joe Haselbock to unlawfully permit Mrs. E. Gotcher to work more than 10 hours. The trial ended with verdict against Muller, sentencing him to pay a $10 fine.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Muller v Oregon?
Muller v. Oregon was a Supreme Court case decided on February 24, 1908. It was based on an Oregon law that was passed in 1903 that set working hours for women. The Oregon law stated that women could not work more than ten hours a day in jobs associated with factories and laundries.
What was the issue in Muller v Muller?
Muller v. State of Oregon. At issue was an Oregon law passed in 1903 that prohibited women from working more than 10 hours in one day. Curt Muller, a laundry owner, was charged in 1905 with permitting a supervisor to require Mrs. E. Gotcher to work more than 10 hours and was fined $10.
What was the significance of the case Oregon v Oregon?
Oregon was a Supreme Court case decided on February 24, 1908. It was based on an Oregon law that was passed in 1903 that set working hours for women. The Oregon law stated that women could not work more than ten hours a day in jobs associated with factories and laundries.
What did David Brewer do in Muller v Oregon?
David J. Brewer. …wrote the majority opinion in Muller v. Oregon (1908), sustaining a state law that limited to 10 the daily working hours of women factory employees. From 1895 to 1897 he served as president of the commission appointed by Congress to investigate the boundary dispute between Venezuela and British Guiana.….