What is a literature review in an empirical study?

What is a literature review in an empirical study?

The most prevalent one is the “literature review” or “background” section within a journal paper or a chapter in a graduate thesis. This section synthesizes the extant literature and usually identifies the gaps in knowledge that the empirical study addresses ( Sylvester, Tate, & Johnstone, 2013 ).

What are the different types of literature reviews?

Literature reviews can take two major forms. The most prevalent one is the “literature review” or “background” section within a journal paper or a chapter in a graduate thesis. This section synthesizes the extant literature and usually identifies the gaps in knowledge that the empirical study addresses ( Sylvester, Tate, & Johnstone, 2013 ).

What is a targeted literature review?

WRITING A TARGETED LITERATURE REVIEW targeted literature review is NOT: ¡ a sophisticated evaluation of the entire literature or literatures related to your topic ¡ a set of thinly connected summaries of important related works haphazardly selected from many subfields

How to write a good introduction for a literature review?

¡  be aware that key definitions and background should be provided in the introduction to orient your reader to the topic. the literature review is the place to provide more extended discussions, such as terms that emerge from complicated theoretical traditions 2. MOTIVATE YOUR RESEARCH

What is a literature review in a thesis?

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question. It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation, or research paper, in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge. What is the purpose of a literature review?

How should extracted data be presented in literature reviews?

The extracted data must be presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the extant literature ( Jesson et al., 2011 ). Webster and Watson (2002) warn researchers that literature reviews should be much more than lists of papers and should provide a coherent lens to make sense of extant knowledge on a given topic.

What is the conversational equivalent of a literature review?

After you hang about eavesdropping to get the drift of what’s being said (the conversational equivalent of the literature review), you join the conversation with a contribution that signals your shared interest in the topic, your knowledge of what’s already been said, and your intention.”9