Table of Contents
What is a concept Deleuze and Guattari?
Deleuze and Guattari define philosophy, famously, as an activity that consists in ‘forming, inventing and fabricating concepts’.
Is Deleuze transcendental?
Difference and Givenness From one end of his philosophical work to the other, Gilles Deleuze consistently described his position as a transcendental empiricism.
What kind of philosophy is Deleuze?
Deleuze conceived of philosophy as the production of concepts, and he characterized himself as a “pure metaphysician.” In his magnum opus Difference and Repetition, he tries to develop a metaphysics adequate to contemporary mathematics and science—a metaphysics in which the concept of multiplicity replaces that of …
What did Deleuze say about schizophrenia?
37, 51, 139), Deleuze and Guattari believe that since the schizophrenic lives at the level of pure, unconstrained desire (i.e., forces of production), his experience has revolutionary potential, while desire in a “normal” or “socialized” individual is subjugated to the established order (e.g., Deleuze & Guattari, 2000.
What should I read before Deleuze?
In particular, consider reading Lautman, Ruyer and Simondon; these are critical sources for Deleuze, and will make many of his subtleties more clear (Nietzsche and Spinoza can also help here too.)
What are intensive and extensive differences according to Deleuze?
With the notions of intensive and extensive we come upon a crucial distinction for Deleuze that is explored in Chapters 4 and 5 of Difference and Repetition. Extensive differences, such as length, area or volume, are intrinsically divisible.
How does Deleuze find a differential genetic principle?
In Chapters 1 and 2, to find a differential genetic principle, Deleuze works through the history of philosophy to isolate the concepts of “difference in itself” and “repetition for itself” that the assumptions of previous philosophies had prevented from being formulated.
What is Deleuze’s “conception of difference”?
In an early article on Bergson (“The Conception of Difference in Bergson” [1956]), Deleuze gave a particularly helpful example of this notion. In La Pensée et le Mouvant, Bergson had shown that there are two ways of determining what the spectrum of “colors” have in common.
Is Deleuze doing philosophy in his own name?
Murphy 1992 suggests that the first part of the book (the Introduction and Chapters 1 and 2) constitutes Deleuze’s treatment of the history of philosophy, while in the second part of the book (Chapters 4 and 5) Deleuze is doing philosophy in his own name.