Who is Beowulf protecting?
Beowulf reigns as a great king for fifty years, protecting the Geats from all the other tribes around them, especially the Swedes. He is an honorable and heroic warrior-king, rewarding his loyal thanes (warrior lords) and taking care of his people.
What is Beowulf known for?
Beowulf is a heroic poem, considered the highest achievement of Old English literature and the earliest European vernacular epic. It deals with events of the early 6th century CE and is believed to have been composed between 700 and 750.
What is the influence of Beowulf?
JRR Tolkien, who was a noted expert on the poem, is widely thought to have taken inspiration from Beowulf for his Lord of the Rings trilogy. According to Prof Andrew Burn, from University College London (UCL), the roots of popular medieval-themed video games and TV shows can also be found in this epic saga.
What is the solution in the story of Beowulf?
Grendel’s Mother When he swims to Grendel’s mother’s underwater lair and removes her head, the conflict is resolved. Beowulf acts here to defend his own honor.
What is the Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 for other purposes?
An Act to amend the law relating to terrorist acts, and for other purposes This Act may be cited as the Anti‑Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005. (1) Each provision of this Act specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table.
When does a person commit an offence under subsection (1) of terrorism?
(2) A person commits an offence under subsection (1) even if: (b) the funds will not be used to facilitate or engage in a specific terrorist act; or (c) the funds will be used to facilitate or engage in more than one terrorist act.
Is the prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 incompatible with human rights?
In April 2006, in his judgment in the case of Re MB, Mr Justice Sullivan issued a declaration under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 that section 3 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 was incompatible with the right to fair proceedings under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Mr Justice Sullivan held:
What was the purpose of the Terrorism Act?
The Act allowed the Home Secretary to impose “control orders” on people who were suspected of involvement in terrorism, which in some cases may have derogated (opted out) from human rights laws.