Table of Contents
Why was the Milgram experiment considered unethical?
The experiment is considered unethical because the people who were the participants were led to believe that they were administering a shock to real people. The individuals were unaware the learners were individuals associated with Milligram.
What were the criticisms of the Milgram experiment?
Some of the major ethical issues in the experiment were related to: The use of deception. The lack of protection for the participants who were involved. Pressure from the experimenter to continue even after asking to stop, interfering with participants’ right to withdraw.
What ethical guidelines did Milgram break?
He concluded that under the right circumstances ordinary people will obey unjust orders. Milgram’s study has been heavily criticised for breaking numerous ethical guidelines, including: deception, right to withdraw and protection from harm.
What are the ethical concerns violations in the Milgram study and the Zimbardo study?
Were ethical issues involved in the Milgram and Zimbardo studies? Many researchers feel that there were. Some deceit was involved in both studies, and participants were not fully informed. There was also the possibility of psychological or physical harm to the participants.
How do you make the Milgram experiment ethical?
Modern ethical standards assert that participants in any experiment must not be deceived, and that they must be made aware of any consequences. In the interest of fairness, follow up research, performed after the experiment, indicated that there were no long term psychological effects on the participants.
What was the ethical breach in the Milgram obedience experiment quizlet?
Ethical issues. Deception was broken because pps were told it was an experiment into memory rather than obedience which it was. Protection from psychological harm was broken by some participants suffering from seizures.
What was the main risk to participants in Milgram’s study quizlet?
The participants were deceived: they were lead to believe that the shocks were real, that the confederate was real and that the drawing of lots was also real.
What was the deception in the Milgram experiment?
Deception – the participants actually believed they were shocking a real person and were unaware the learner was a confederate of Milgram’s. However, Milgram argued that “illusion is used when necessary in order to set the stage for the revelation of certain difficult-to-get-at-truths.”
How was Milgram’s sample biased?
Milgram’s sample was biased: Milgram’s study cannot be seen as representative of the American population as his sample was self-selected. This is because they became participants only by electing to respond to a newspaper advertisement (selecting themselves).
What are the ethical issues of the Milgram experiment?
ETHICAL PROBLEMS. There are 3 main ethical issues with the Milgram experiment: deception, protection of participants, and right to withdrawal. Each of those issues, as well as Milgram’s argument, is discussed in detail below: 1) Deception – The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person, and were unaware the learner was
Was the Milgram Experiment ethical or valid?
Based on new guidelines for ethics, Stanley Milgram’s experiment on the obedience to authority was neither ethical nor valid. Controversy in the ethics of the experiment comes from the deception used and psychological harm experienced by some of the participants. Milgram believed that for the experiment to be authentic, deception was inevitable.
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
The original Milgram study has a number of major problems. His study was unethical because Milgram lied to his respondents. The Asch conformity study has a major flaw. In ignoring the importance of race, class, and gender in conformity, Asch failed to recognize the importance of these factors.
Why is Tuskegee Syphilis Study unethical?
Why was the U.S. Public Health Service’s Tuskegee Syphilis Study unethical? A. There is no evidence that researchers obtained informed consent from participants, and participants were not offered available treatments, even after penicillin became widely available.